British Battlecruisers 1939-45 (New Vanguard)
Product Description: When war broke out in 1939, only three true battlecruisers remained in the Royal Navy including HMS ‘Hood’, the world's largest and fastest capital ship for much of her life, which would be destroyed in action against the German battleship ‘Bismarck’. Out of the remaining two battlecruisers (‘Repulse’ and ‘Renown’) one was sunk by Japanese aircraft off Singapore, whilst the other served with distinction until the end of the war. This book traces the pre-war development of these spectacular warships, then describes their wartime exploits, using this to demonstrate their operational and mechanical performance. It examines what life was like on these wartime battlecruisers when they sailed into action.
Subjects: American history, European history (ie other than Britain & Ireland), History, History - Military / War, History: American, Europe, USA, United Kingdom, Great Britain, Europe - Great Britain - General, Military - Naval, Military - Weapons, History / Military / World War II,
Disapointing
Very disapointed in this book.
The analysis and arguments presented a brief, not well argued, and the author offers nothing new.
He also goes into some depth on the development and build of the ships that were turned into carriers at the end of the 1st world war. Yes these existed in 1939/45 but were not now Battlecruisers. In my opinion are not relevent to this subject and waste valuble space in even mentioning them in such a brief publication.
In contrast the companion volume - British Battlecruisers 1914-18, is much better thought out and offers much more than this volume.
Nothing New Here
This volume takes the traditional "Battlecruisers were a flawed concept" the author puts forward Nothing new, and outrightly contraticts the author of he the companion Volume (British Battlecruisers 19314-18) It is a pity that the authors on these two volumes did not collaborate to provide a consistent theme to this story. Of the two I would recommend the companion violumne trather than this one because of the difference in view-The volume adds nothing new to the subject
Less Bang for the Buck
At first glance, Osprey New Vanguard #88, British Battle cruisers 1939-1945, is an attractively packaged and interesting summary about a very controversial class of warships. The back of the volume and the title suggests that this volume will provide detailed information about the three British battlecruisers - the Hood, Repulse and Renown - which served in the Second World War. Unfortunately, the attractiveness of this volume quickly begins to dissipate after the first few pages when it becomes clear to the reader that the author intends to widen his scope beyond these three warships and that his research effort was modest, at best. Certainly Angus Konstam is one of Osprey's better writers, but he has been cranking out volumes at a rapid clip in the past few years (5-6 per year) and it is apparent that the author did not take (or have) the time necessary to delve beyond the superficial level of this subject.
Konstam begins with a short introduction outlining the history of the battlecruiser concept in the Royal Navy back to the 1860s, followed by lengthier sections on the development, construction and modifications of the six British battlecruisers that were built between 1916-1920. Of these, three were converted to aircraft carriers shortly after completion and saw minimal service as battlecruisers. Konstam then provides outline sections on the service history of the Repulse, Renown and Hood and summaries of the three main battlecruiser actions in the Second World War. The color plates include: HMS Repulse in 1916 and 1941; HMS Hood engaging the Bismarck; HMS Hood in 1920, HMS Glorious as battlecruiser and carrier; a very nice cutaway of HMS Hood in 1941; HMS Renown in 1941 and 1943; the sinking of HMS Repulse; and a gun turret from the Hood. Overall, the graphic quality of this volume is very high but the bibliography is suspiciously lightweight (no mention of the Naval Institute classic on British battleships and battlecruisers by Allen Raven).
Unfortunately, the technical detail in this volume does not go beyond - or even meet the ordinary. A quick glance at the three pages of Jane's from the Second World War editions provide more technical data than Konstam does in 48 pages here. Unlike Jane's, Konstam provides no overhead deck layouts of the vessels and no diagrams that depict the armor belt. All of this was easily feasible from available secondary sources, but no effort was made. In fact, the only data that Konstam provides is the very basic features such as displacement, measurements, machinery, speed, armor belt in inches, armament and complement. The author also provides a separate data box on the 15" gun, but there is no data on the secondary armament. Part of the problem is that the author devotes too much space to the three battlecruisers that were converted to carriers, which steals valuable space available for the main topic.
However, Konstam also fails to attempt any real analysis of these three warships and he omits critical data altogether, less cost and fuel consumption. While the "R" class battleships each cost about £2.5 million and the "Queen Elizabeth" class battleships cost £3 million each, HMS Repulse cost £2.6 million, HMS Renown cost £3.1 million and HMS Hood cost a whopping £6 million to build. Furthermore, during the 1920s when budgets were tight and the Royal Navy could only afford to build a small number of modern warships, HMS Hood was costing over £400,000 a year to maintain. Thus, instead of three lightly protected, under-armed (Repulse and Renown had only six, not eight main guns) but fast battlecruisers, the British could have had four more battleships that were more capable overall. The high cost of the battlecruisers was further exacerbated by their excessive fuel consumption - Konstam does not mention that the 20-30% greater speed of the battlecruisers over the battleships came at the cost of 300% greater fuel consumption, both at full speed and even cruising. Hood, Renown and Repulse were fuel hogs with very short legs. Adding insult to injury, the Royal Navy spent upwards over £5 million constantly tinkering with these ships during the interwar period, but they were still woefully unprepared for war in 1939.
Konstam hints that these ships were retained for non-practical reasons such as sentimental attachment to the battlecruiser theory (despite disaster at Jutland in 1916) and prestige reasons, but he does not delve deeply enough into this subject, which is probably crucial to understanding why Britain devoted so much resources to a faulty weapons system. Konstam also fails to scratch more than the surface of the two main battlecruiser actions in the Second World War - the Battle of Denmark Strait and the destruction of Force "Z" off Malaya (no tactical maps or eyewitness accounts provided). Vice-Admiral Holland's (on HMS Hood) decision to engage the Bismarck while in the aggressive tradition of the Royal Navy, exceeded his mission which was to find the enemy, deny them use of the strait and then track the enemy until superior forces could be brought to bear. A 1-1 fight to the death against two of the newest warships in the world was unnecessary and dumb. Similarly, the poor judgment of Admiral Phillips contributed greatly to the loss of HMS Repulse (unfortunately, Konstam apparently did not use Martin Middlebrook's excellent book on the sinking of the Repulse). Thus, the aggressive nature of the men who rose to command battlecruisers might have been as culpable as the designers.
It is also odd that Konstam makes no mention of the wrecks of the Hood and Repulse, both of which have been found and photographed. In particular, recent visits to the grave of the Hood have revealed new details about her demise. In sum, this volume is fine as a bare-bones summary, but provides no in-depth detail.
